Ises a possibility that the spinal receptors for bombesin-related peptides may exclusively regulate itch neurotransmission and need further investigation for the identification of novel pharmacological targets to block pruritus. The first part of the study determined the basic characteristics of scratching induced by intrathecally administered bombesin, GRP and NMB in mice. By testing multiple doses, this study established dose response curves for bombesin, GRP and NMB and identified minimum dose of each peptide required to produce maximum scratching response. All three peptides elicited scratching dosedose response curve of GRP-induced scratching, thus Bromopyruvic acid price maintaining the minimum dose of GRP (0.1 nmol) required to produce maximum scratching response. On the other hand, RC-3095 failed to cause a rightward shift in the dose response curve of NMB-induced scratching and maintained the minimum dose of NMB (1 nmol) required to produce maximum scratching response. Figure 5 illustrates the effects of intrathecal administration of RC-3095 (0.1 nmol) or PD168368 (3 nmol) alone or their coadministration as a 10 min pretreatment on bombesin-induced scratching. As with the vehicle pretreatment, no change in the dose response curve of bombesin-induced scratching was observed following pretreatment with RC-3095, PD168368 or their combination. Magnitude and minimum dose of bombesinRole of Spinal GRPr and NMBr in Itch ScratchingFigure 6. Effects of high dose of intrathecal RC-3095 on scratching induced by bombesin-related peptides and motor function. Top panel shows effects of RC-3095 on GRP, NMB and bombesin-induced scratching (n = 6) (A). Bottom panel shows effects of RC-3095 on the time spent by a mouse balancing on the rotarod (B). Mice (n = 10) were placed on the rotarod 10 min after the injection of RC-3095 and allowed to balance for 180 sec at different speeds. Different symbols represent different dosing ITI007 conditions. Each value represents Mean 6 SEM. An asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the vehicle controls (open bars or open circles; 0 mg) (P,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067422.gdependently with different degree and duration of scratching activity. Bombesin evoked most profound scratching response that lasted over 1 h, followed by GRP which evoked robust response 23148522 for 40 min whereas NMB induced mild scratching which lasted for 20 min. It is possible that the three peptides have different rates of proteolytic degradation, which might lead to the different durations of action. Such differences in the duration and magnitude of bombesin, GRP and NMB following spinal and supraspinal administration have been previously documented in rodents [13,14,18]. Itch is one of the most prevalent and severe side effects of spinally administered MOP agonists like morphine and DAMGO, which also elicit long lasting profound scratching in monkeys at the antinociceptive doses, as seen in human subjects [31?3]. Antagonist studies reveal that in primates, intrathecal morphineinduced itch is mediated by selective activation of MOP but notother opioid receptor subtypes [32]. In addition to attenuating MOP-mediated itch, MOP antagonists have also been used to treat itch caused by liver diseases like cholestasis [34,35]. This indicates that itch neurotransmission is at least in part driven by the endogenous opioids. However, other neurotransmitters of itch may be involved. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether other itch mediators like bombesi.Ises a possibility that the spinal receptors for bombesin-related peptides may exclusively regulate itch neurotransmission and need further investigation for the identification of novel pharmacological targets to block pruritus. The first part of the study determined the basic characteristics of scratching induced by intrathecally administered bombesin, GRP and NMB in mice. By testing multiple doses, this study established dose response curves for bombesin, GRP and NMB and identified minimum dose of each peptide required to produce maximum scratching response. All three peptides elicited scratching dosedose response curve of GRP-induced scratching, thus maintaining the minimum dose of GRP (0.1 nmol) required to produce maximum scratching response. On the other hand, RC-3095 failed to cause a rightward shift in the dose response curve of NMB-induced scratching and maintained the minimum dose of NMB (1 nmol) required to produce maximum scratching response. Figure 5 illustrates the effects of intrathecal administration of RC-3095 (0.1 nmol) or PD168368 (3 nmol) alone or their coadministration as a 10 min pretreatment on bombesin-induced scratching. As with the vehicle pretreatment, no change in the dose response curve of bombesin-induced scratching was observed following pretreatment with RC-3095, PD168368 or their combination. Magnitude and minimum dose of bombesinRole of Spinal GRPr and NMBr in Itch ScratchingFigure 6. Effects of high dose of intrathecal RC-3095 on scratching induced by bombesin-related peptides and motor function. Top panel shows effects of RC-3095 on GRP, NMB and bombesin-induced scratching (n = 6) (A). Bottom panel shows effects of RC-3095 on the time spent by a mouse balancing on the rotarod (B). Mice (n = 10) were placed on the rotarod 10 min after the injection of RC-3095 and allowed to balance for 180 sec at different speeds. Different symbols represent different dosing conditions. Each value represents Mean 6 SEM. An asterisk (*) represents significant difference from the vehicle controls (open bars or open circles; 0 mg) (P,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067422.gdependently with different degree and duration of scratching activity. Bombesin evoked most profound scratching response that lasted over 1 h, followed by GRP which evoked robust response 23148522 for 40 min whereas NMB induced mild scratching which lasted for 20 min. It is possible that the three peptides have different rates of proteolytic degradation, which might lead to the different durations of action. Such differences in the duration and magnitude of bombesin, GRP and NMB following spinal and supraspinal administration have been previously documented in rodents [13,14,18]. Itch is one of the most prevalent and severe side effects of spinally administered MOP agonists like morphine and DAMGO, which also elicit long lasting profound scratching in monkeys at the antinociceptive doses, as seen in human subjects [31?3]. Antagonist studies reveal that in primates, intrathecal morphineinduced itch is mediated by selective activation of MOP but notother opioid receptor subtypes [32]. In addition to attenuating MOP-mediated itch, MOP antagonists have also been used to treat itch caused by liver diseases like cholestasis [34,35]. This indicates that itch neurotransmission is at least in part driven by the endogenous opioids. However, other neurotransmitters of itch may be involved. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether other itch mediators like bombesi.
