Ns on catalase mRNA Finafloxacin web expression (A) and activity (B) in the mosquito midgut. C ?H2O2 production in the midgut of insects silenced for catalase and b-gal (control) genes. D ?Prevalence of P. vivax infection in insects after b-gal and catalase dsRNA injections. E and F ?Oocysts numbers in the midguts of dsb-gal and dsCat injected mosquitoes 3? days after Plasmodium infection. The arrows show P. vivax oocysts in the A. aquasalis midgut. G: Bacterial load based on 16 s gene in the gut of mosquitoes silenced with dsCat and dsb-gal. In figure A, data were analyzed by the ANOVA test with multiple comparisons 22948146 of Tukey or Games-Howell or Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple comparisons of Dunn’s; in figures B and C by unpaired t-test; in the figure E by the Mann-Whitney test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057014.gmosquito midgut, the expression of SOD3A at 24 h had similar levels in infected and control insects, increased 36 h after bloodfeeding, and again was not altered by infection. The expression of SOD3B was very low in the midgut, not reaching the level of sugar-fed controls. AqSOD activity decreased in the midgut 24 h after infection compared to blood fed control mosquitoes, although the difference was not significant. This may be due to the cumulative measurement of other SODs as SOD1 and SOD 2.The levels of mRNA for the two antioxidant enzymes catalase and SOD3B increased in the whole insect upon infection, which might be understood as an attempt of the mosquito to return free radicals to normal levels in their body, possibly counteracting increasing production by the activated immune system. However, when enzyme activity was measured in the midgut, 
both catalase and SOD showed reduced activity after infection. In our attempts to silence catalase we obtained silencing of 
midgut. Catalase silencingROS in Anopheles aquasalis Immune Responsehad a significant effect on catalase activity and in hydrogen peroxide levels in insect guts. Surprisingly, catalase knockdown exacerbated the infection of A. aquasalis by P. vivax. The opposite was reported for P. berghei parasites and A. gambiae [20], suggesting important functional differences regarding Plasmodium immunity in the A. aquasalis ?P. vivax pair. Possible explanations are that the levels of ROS generated in the midgut of A. aquasalis are relatively low and do not compromise P. vivax survival or that P. vivax may have a much higher ability to detoxify ROS than P. berghei. We observed a decrease of natural microbiota in the mosquito midgut after catalase silencing. It is also possible that catalase knockdown led to the increase of ROS causing a decrease of competitive bacteria, thus allowing better P. vivax development inside the A. aquasalis mosquitoes. A similar situation was seen in Docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide Salmonella typhimurium infection of the mammalian gut [43]. These bacteria use the reactive oxygen species generated during inflammation to react with endogenous compounds generating a growth advantage for S. 18204824 typhimurium over the competing microbiota in the lumen of the inflamed gut. It was also shown that oxidative stress generated in response to infection by the parasite T. cruzi contributes to maintenance of high parasite burdens in human macrophages [44]. In conclusion, upregulation of detoxifying enzyme genes in the mosquito whole body at 36 h after infection, when the parasite is fixing in the basal lamina and thus exposed to the haemolymph, may be due to expression in fat body and hemocytes. On the other hand,.Ns on catalase mRNA expression (A) and activity (B) in the mosquito midgut. C ?H2O2 production in the midgut of insects silenced for catalase and b-gal (control) genes. D ?Prevalence of P. vivax infection in insects after b-gal and catalase dsRNA injections. E and F ?Oocysts numbers in the midguts of dsb-gal and dsCat injected mosquitoes 3? days after Plasmodium infection. The arrows show P. vivax oocysts in the A. aquasalis midgut. G: Bacterial load based on 16 s gene in the gut of mosquitoes silenced with dsCat and dsb-gal. In figure A, data were analyzed by the ANOVA test with multiple comparisons 22948146 of Tukey or Games-Howell or Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple comparisons of Dunn’s; in figures B and C by unpaired t-test; in the figure E by the Mann-Whitney test. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057014.gmosquito midgut, the expression of SOD3A at 24 h had similar levels in infected and control insects, increased 36 h after bloodfeeding, and again was not altered by infection. The expression of SOD3B was very low in the midgut, not reaching the level of sugar-fed controls. AqSOD activity decreased in the midgut 24 h after infection compared to blood fed control mosquitoes, although the difference was not significant. This may be due to the cumulative measurement of other SODs as SOD1 and SOD 2.The levels of mRNA for the two antioxidant enzymes catalase and SOD3B increased in the whole insect upon infection, which might be understood as an attempt of the mosquito to return free radicals to normal levels in their body, possibly counteracting increasing production by the activated immune system. However, when enzyme activity was measured in the midgut, both catalase and SOD showed reduced activity after infection. In our attempts to silence catalase we obtained silencing of midgut. Catalase silencingROS in Anopheles aquasalis Immune Responsehad a significant effect on catalase activity and in hydrogen peroxide levels in insect guts. Surprisingly, catalase knockdown exacerbated the infection of A. aquasalis by P. vivax. The opposite was reported for P. berghei parasites and A. gambiae [20], suggesting important functional differences regarding Plasmodium immunity in the A. aquasalis ?P. vivax pair. Possible explanations are that the levels of ROS generated in the midgut of A. aquasalis are relatively low and do not compromise P. vivax survival or that P. vivax may have a much higher ability to detoxify ROS than P. berghei. We observed a decrease of natural microbiota in the mosquito midgut after catalase silencing. It is also possible that catalase knockdown led to the increase of ROS causing a decrease of competitive bacteria, thus allowing better P. vivax development inside the A. aquasalis mosquitoes. A similar situation was seen in Salmonella typhimurium infection of the mammalian gut [43]. These bacteria use the reactive oxygen species generated during inflammation to react with endogenous compounds generating a growth advantage for S. 18204824 typhimurium over the competing microbiota in the lumen of the inflamed gut. It was also shown that oxidative stress generated in response to infection by the parasite T. cruzi contributes to maintenance of high parasite burdens in human macrophages [44]. In conclusion, upregulation of detoxifying enzyme genes in the mosquito whole body at 36 h after infection, when the parasite is fixing in the basal lamina and thus exposed to the haemolymph, may be due to expression in fat body and hemocytes. On the other hand,.
