Duallevel interactions to explain these phenomena, of which we assess the likelihood using Bayesian model selection at the fine scale, and finally checking the consistency of the selected rules with the Flagecidin biological activity large-scale emergent group behaviour by simulation of the selected model. Further manipulating the social cues available to individuals before and during collective decisions will provoke a wider variety of possible individual-level sensory responses, allow for selection over a wider variety of interaction Y-27632 chemical information models and provide intriguing insights into the decision-making process.rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org J. R. Soc. Interface 11:4. Material and methods4.1. Experimental animals, methods and protocolsResearch was carried out at One Tree Island (2238300 2600 , 152850 2500 ), Great Barrier Reef, between 16?24 September 2010 and 10 ?14 January 2011. We collected fish by lightly anaesthetizing them using a mix of clove oil, ethanol and seawater. Fish were caught using hand nets and were transported in mesh cages allowing water flow and thus aiding the fishes’ recovery from the anaesthetic. Fish recovered from the anaesthetic within less than 3 min. We transported fish back to aquaria facilities and placed each group into its own housing tank (645 ?413 ?276 mm) with flow-through saltwater pumped in from the lagoon. In each housing tank, we placed pieces of dead coral for refuge. The fish were left to acclimate to the aquaria for at least 36 h prior to experimentation. Fish were fed flaked fish food, and zooplankton collected with seine nets ad libitum. The fish acclimated quickly to the aquaria facilities, and we did not observe any mortality over the time fish were kept in captivity (maximum 5 days). After experimentation, all fish were returned to where they were caught. We constructed a rectangular arena (300 ?1400 ?210 mm) from 6 mm white Perspex (figure 1). At each end of the arena, we placed small pieces of coral rubble on the tank floor so that they covered an area of 330 cm2. We also placed a piece of coral skeleton (longest dimension 100 ?widest dimension 80 mm) in the Torin 1 biological activity centre of the coral rubble at each end of the arena, ensuring that these two pieces were of similar size. A central divider (210 ?300 mm) made of 3 mm white opaque acyclic initially divided the two halves of the arena, but could be remotely removed using a monofilament line. The removal of this divider then connected the two halves of the arena. The arena was filled to a depth of 180 mm with seawater and was lit using 40 W fluorescent lamps. For each trial, we randomly selected a number of fish from one of the housing tanks and placed them into the arena, ensuring that we initially had at least one fish on each side of thearena. We selected group sizes of three (n ?16), four (n ?16), five (n ?11) or six individuals (n ?14). To abide by animal ethics and National Marine Park protocols, we did not catch enough groups to only be used once. Therefore, we re-used fish between trials, but SCIO-469 price randomized group size over time and fish were never used in the same group size more than once. After fish had been in the arena for 5 min, we remotely removed the central divider, allowing fish to move between the two coral patches. We filmed trials (at 15 fps) for 10 min using a camera (Logitech Pro 9000) placed directly above the centre of the tank. After each trial, we took photos of each fish to later calculate each fish’s size and then returned fish to their original housing tank. Fi.Duallevel interactions to explain these phenomena, of which we assess the likelihood using Bayesian model selection at the fine scale, and finally checking the consistency of the selected rules with the large-scale emergent group behaviour by simulation of the selected model. Further manipulating the social cues available to individuals before and during collective decisions will provoke a wider variety of possible individual-level sensory responses, allow for selection over a wider variety of interaction models and provide intriguing insights into the decision-making process.rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org J. R. Soc. Interface 11:4. Material and methods4.1. Experimental animals, methods and protocolsResearch was carried out at One Tree Island (2238300 2600 , 152850 2500 ), Great Barrier Reef, between 16?24 September 2010 and 10 ?14 January 2011. We collected fish by lightly anaesthetizing them using a mix of clove oil, ethanol and seawater. Fish were caught using hand nets and were transported in mesh cages allowing water flow and thus aiding the fishes’ recovery from the anaesthetic. Fish recovered from the anaesthetic within less than 3 min. We transported fish back to aquaria facilities and placed each group into its own housing tank (645 ?413 ?276 mm) with flow-through saltwater pumped in from the lagoon. In each housing tank, we placed pieces of dead coral for refuge. The fish were left to acclimate to the aquaria for at least 36 h prior to experimentation. Fish were fed flaked fish food, and zooplankton collected with seine nets ad libitum. The fish acclimated quickly to the aquaria facilities, and we did not observe any mortality over the time fish were kept in captivity (maximum 5 days). After experimentation, all fish were returned to where they were caught. We constructed a rectangular arena (300 ?1400 ?210 mm) from 6 mm white Perspex (figure 1). At each end of the arena, we placed small pieces of coral rubble on the tank floor so that they covered an area of 330 cm2. We also placed a piece of coral skeleton (longest dimension 100 ?widest dimension 80 mm) in the centre of the coral rubble at each end of the arena, ensuring that these two pieces were of similar size. A central divider (210 ?300 mm) made of 3 mm white opaque acyclic initially divided the two halves of the arena, but could be remotely removed using a monofilament line. The removal of this divider then connected the two halves of the arena. The arena was filled to a depth of 180 mm with seawater and was lit using 40 W fluorescent lamps. For each trial, we randomly selected a number of fish from one of the housing tanks and placed them into the arena, ensuring that we initially had at least one fish on each side of thearena. We selected group sizes of three (n ?16), four (n ?16), five (n ?11) or six individuals (n ?14). To abide by animal ethics and National Marine Park protocols, we did not catch enough groups to only be used once. Therefore, we re-used fish between trials, but randomized group size over time and fish were never used in the same group size more than once. After fish had been in the arena for 5 min, we remotely removed the central divider, allowing fish to move between the two coral patches. We filmed trials (at 15 fps) for 10 min using a camera (Logitech Pro 9000) placed directly above the centre of the tank. After each trial, we took photos of each fish to later calculate each fish’s size and then returned fish to their original housing tank. Fi.Duallevel interactions to explain these phenomena, of which we assess the likelihood using Bayesian model selection at the fine scale, and finally checking the consistency of the selected rules with the large-scale emergent group behaviour by simulation of the selected model. Further manipulating the social cues available to individuals before and during collective decisions will provoke a wider variety of possible individual-level sensory responses, allow for selection over a wider variety of interaction models and provide intriguing insights into the decision-making process.rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org J. R. Soc. Interface 11:4. Material and methods4.1. Experimental animals, methods and protocolsResearch was carried out at One Tree Island (2238300 2600 , 152850 2500 ), Great Barrier Reef, between 16?24 September 2010 and 10 ?14 January 2011. We collected fish by lightly anaesthetizing them using a mix of clove oil, ethanol and seawater. Fish were caught using hand nets and were transported in mesh cages allowing water flow and thus aiding the fishes’ recovery from the anaesthetic. Fish recovered from the anaesthetic within less than 3 min. We transported fish back to aquaria facilities and placed each group into its own housing tank (645 ?413 ?276 mm) with flow-through saltwater pumped in from the lagoon. In each housing tank, we placed pieces of dead coral for refuge. The fish were left to acclimate to the aquaria for at least 36 h prior to experimentation. Fish were fed flaked fish food, and zooplankton collected with seine nets ad libitum. The fish acclimated quickly to the aquaria facilities, and we did not observe any mortality over the time fish were kept in captivity (maximum 5 days). After experimentation, all fish were returned to where they were caught. We constructed a rectangular arena (300 ?1400 ?210 mm) from 6 mm white Perspex (figure 1). At each end of the arena, we placed small pieces of coral rubble on the tank floor so that they covered an area of 330 cm2. We also placed a piece of coral skeleton (longest dimension 100 ?widest dimension 80 mm) in the centre of the coral rubble at each end of the arena, ensuring that these two pieces were of similar size. A central divider (210 ?300 mm) made of 3 mm white opaque acyclic initially divided the two halves of the arena, but could be remotely removed using a monofilament line. The removal of this divider then connected the two halves of the arena. The arena was filled to a depth of 180 mm with seawater and was lit using 40 W fluorescent lamps. For each trial, we randomly selected a number of fish from one of the housing tanks and placed them into the arena, ensuring that we initially had at least one fish on each side of thearena. We selected group sizes of three (n ?16), four (n ?16), five (n ?11) or six individuals (n ?14). To abide by animal ethics and National Marine Park protocols, we did not catch enough groups to only be used once. Therefore, we re-used fish between trials, but randomized group size over time and fish were never used in the same group size more than once. After fish had been in the arena for 5 min, we remotely removed the central divider, allowing fish to move between the two coral patches. We filmed trials (at 15 fps) for 10 min using a camera (Logitech Pro 9000) placed directly above the centre of the tank. After each trial, we took photos of each fish to later calculate each fish’s size and then returned fish to their original housing tank. Fi.Duallevel interactions to explain these phenomena, of which we assess the likelihood using Bayesian model selection at the fine scale, and finally checking the consistency of the selected rules with the large-scale emergent group behaviour by simulation of the selected model. Further manipulating the social cues available to individuals before and during collective decisions will provoke a wider variety of possible individual-level sensory responses, allow for selection over a wider variety of interaction models and provide intriguing insights into the decision-making process.rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org J. R. Soc. Interface 11:4. Material and methods4.1. Experimental animals, methods and protocolsResearch was carried out at One Tree Island (2238300 2600 , 152850 2500 ), Great Barrier Reef, between 16?24 September 2010 and 10 ?14 January 2011. We collected fish by lightly anaesthetizing them using a mix of clove oil, ethanol and seawater. Fish were caught using hand nets and were transported in mesh cages allowing water flow and thus aiding the fishes’ recovery from the anaesthetic. Fish recovered from the anaesthetic within less than 3 min. We transported fish back to aquaria facilities and placed each group into its own housing tank (645 ?413 ?276 mm) with flow-through saltwater pumped in from the lagoon. In each housing tank, we placed pieces of dead coral for refuge. The fish were left to acclimate to the aquaria for at least 36 h prior to experimentation. Fish were fed flaked fish food, and zooplankton collected with seine nets ad libitum. The fish acclimated quickly to the aquaria facilities, and we did not observe any mortality over the time fish were kept in captivity (maximum 5 days). After experimentation, all fish were returned to where they were caught. We constructed a rectangular arena (300 ?1400 ?210 mm) from 6 mm white Perspex (figure 1). At each end of the arena, we placed small pieces of coral rubble on the tank floor so that they covered an area of 330 cm2. We also placed a piece of coral skeleton (longest dimension 100 ?widest dimension 80 mm) in the centre of the coral rubble at each end of the arena, ensuring that these two pieces were of similar size. A central divider (210 ?300 mm) made of 3 mm white opaque acyclic initially divided the two halves of the arena, but could be remotely removed using a monofilament line. The removal of this divider then connected the two halves of the arena. The arena was filled to a depth of 180 mm with seawater and was lit using 40 W fluorescent lamps. For each trial, we randomly selected a number of fish from one of the housing tanks and placed them into the arena, ensuring that we initially had at least one fish on each side of thearena. We selected group sizes of three (n ?16), four (n ?16), five (n ?11) or six individuals (n ?14). To abide by animal ethics and National Marine Park protocols, we did not catch enough groups to only be used once. Therefore, we re-used fish between trials, but randomized group size over time and fish were never used in the same group size more than once. After fish had been in the arena for 5 min, we remotely removed the central divider, allowing fish to move between the two coral patches. We filmed trials (at 15 fps) for 10 min using a camera (Logitech Pro 9000) placed directly above the centre of the tank. After each trial, we took photos of each fish to later calculate each fish’s size and then returned fish to their original housing tank. Fi.
