“habitat farming”, substantial variations among The assessment of this spatial distribution
“habitat farming”, substantial variations involving The assessment of this spatial distribution showed in whichthe second largest determinant of pro-environmental subsidies (right after the farmer’s environmen- agricultural the identified groups of determinants–environmental ( 49.7 , 23.4 ) and tal awareness) (is 42.four , 28.8 ).important natural habitats within the not confirmed the analysis in the the presence of However, these relationships were boundaries of by farm. This targeted evaluation covered two AECM 2014-20 packages, i.e., correlation coefficients (Table 2). useful bird habitats and endangered bird species in Diversity Library Physicochemical Properties Natura 2000 locations: total ofc.258,700 ha (fromc.600 ha in Silesia Province andc.900 ha in Opole Province toc.52,400 ha in Western Pomerania); precious habitats outdoors Natura 2000 areas: total ofc.197,200 ha (fromc.1500 in Opole Province toc.34,100 ha in Warmia-Masuria).-Land 2021, ten,11 ofThe research also distinguished the category of “habitat farming”, in whichthe second biggest determinant of pro-environmental subsidies (following the farmer’s environmental awareness) will be the presence of worthwhile organic habitats within the boundaries from the farm. This targeted analysis covered two AECM 2014-20 packages, i.e., beneficial bird habitats and endangered bird species in Natura 2000 regions: total ofc.258,700 ha (fromc.600 ha in Silesia Province andc.900 ha in Opole Province toc.52,400 ha in Western Pomerania); valuable habitats outdoors Natura 2000 regions: total ofc.197,200 ha (fromc.1500 in Opole Province toc.34,100 ha in Warmia-Masuria).-21, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEWSupport for habitat farming covered a total of 455,900 ha. This location is very regionally diversified–from c.2300 ha in Opole Province to c.76,400 ha in West Pomerania Province. Inside the program of communities, the biggest regions had been recorded as c.5000 ha in Komancza 13 of 21 (Subcarpathia), c.5300 ha in Slonsk (Lubusz Province) and c.5700 ha in Trzcianne(Podlasie Province) (see Figure 6a).(a)(b)Figure 6. Region of land subsidised with habitat farming, in ha (a), and its share in the total region covered by Figure 6. Region of land subsidised with help forsupport for habitat farming, in ha (a), and its share inside the total region covered by (b). Source: own elaboration. pro-environmental RDP support pro-environmental RDP help (b). Supply: personal elaboration.One essential observation is the fact that thethe help of farms SBP-3264 In Vivo withnegatively with habitats conThe CAP funds allocated to determinants correlated valuable all-natural environmentalstitute, on typical, 35.five from the total pro-environmental payments in Poland. In the conditions (r = -0.319), which consist of, inter alia, the share of protected regions. The dependence level,not confirmed by11.7 in Kuyavia-Pomerania to over 50 in Lubusz and regional was this ranges from evaluation in accordance with groups of determinants (, ), due to the fact, in this case, Table two). It can be very spatially diversebelow-average and Subcarpathia (see the distinction involving thegroups of at the commune level, as observed in above-averagethe substantial differences in (Table 2). of communities in which habitat payments domicommunitieswas over 13 the quantity nate (representing more than 70 of payments) in between the provinces of Kuyavia-Pomerania 3.4. Typology of(six communities), L (eight), OpoleSupport Lower Silesia (44), Lesser Poland (38), Masovia Pro-Environmental Forms of CAP (two) and z (51) and Subcarpathia (70; see Figure 6b). The above-described kinds of support for green agriculture, with.
