Ek Das), S.C. and S.S. (Shreya Some); writing–original draft
Ek Das), S.C. and S.S. (Shreya Some); writing–original draft preparation, O.L., V.J., S.S. (Samridh Sharma), S.C., N.D., A.M. and S.S. (Shreya Some); writing–review and editing, J.R., A.D. (Abhishek Das) and D.L.D.; visualization, O.L., S.C. and D.L.D.; supervision, B.P., B.R. and B.T.; project administration, B.P., J.R., P.B., A.D. (Anupam Debsarkar) and L.P.; funding acquisition, P.B., B.P. and J.R. All authors have read and agreed towards the published version of your manuscript. Funding: This investigation received no external funding and is actually a co-funded effort by Environmental Defense Fund, Indian Institute of Science and Jadavpur University. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.Appendix ATable A1. Names of IDEEA regions, 34-region version. Code AN APY AR AS BR CH CT DL DN GA GJD HP HR JH JK KA KLY Name Andaman and Nicobar Andhra Pradesh and a part of Puducherry Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chandigarh Chhattisgarh Delhi Dadra and Nagar Haveli Goa Gujarat, Daman, and Diu Himachal Pradesh Haryana Jharkhand Jammu and Kashmir Karnataka Kerala and a part of Puducherry Code LD MH ML MN MP MZ NL OR PB RJ SK TG TNY TR UP UT WB Name Lakshadweep Maharashtra Meghalaya Manipur Madhya Pradesh Mizoram Nagaland Odisha Punjab Rajasthan Sikkim Telangana Tamil Nadu and a part of Puducherry Tripura Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand West BengalEnergies 2021, 14, 7063 Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEWEnergies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW30 of 57 29 of29 ofCharybdotoxin Protocol Figure A1. IDEEA spatial division, 34-region version. Figure A1. IDEEAFigure A1. IDEEA34-region version. spatial division, spatial division, 34-region version.Figure A2. GS-626510 Cancer Annual average capacity elements of alternative kind of PV trackers: 41-year average for Figure A2. Annual typical The figure demonstrates variations intrackers:production using option tracking India. Notes: capacity things of option kind of PV energy 41-year average for India. Notes: The figure demonstrates differences intotal annual production is reasonably low forsystems. The total annual productiononerelais systems. The power production applying option tracking India among the models, and Figure A2. Annual average capacity variables of alternative kind of PV trackers: 41-year typical for India. Notes: The figure the tively low for India among the models, and the 1 (tilted) tracker could possibly be a cost-effective solution. (tilted) tracker may well be a cost-effective alternative. demonstrates variations in energy production working with alternative tracking systems. The total annual production is rela-tively low for India amongst the models, and the a single (tilted) tracker might be a cost-effective choice.Energies 2021, 14, 7063 Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW31 of30 ofFigure A3. Annual average wind energy capacity aspect profiles, depending on MERRA-2 data (50 m) and Figure A3. Annual typical wind energy capacity element profiles, determined by MERRA-2 data (50 m) and extrapolated (100 m extrapolated (one hundred m and 150 m) with dynamic Hellmann continuous (working with 10 m and 50 m MERRA-2 data). and 150 m) with dynamic Hellmann continual (working with 10 m and 50 m MERRA-2 information).Energies 2021, 14, 7063 PEER Critique Energies 2021, 14, x FOR32 of 55 31 ofFigure 4. Annual typical generation profile of wind turbines at 50 m hub height by year and region, onshore and offshore (.off) places. Note: The figure demonstrates re.
