L.pone.0065579.ginteraction plays an important role in the formation of hTetracosactide chemical information IAPP22?8 b-sheet-rich oligomers. In summary, without the effects of carbon NPs, hIAPP22?8 peptides are inclined to form partially ordered b-sheet-richoligomers with high b-sheet contents for both four and eight peptides. At the same time, the aggregation process was very quick. It’s well known that amyloid fibrils are generally formed by peptides in extended conformations (b-strands) into b-sheetsFigure 2. Secondary structure profile for four IAPP22?8 peptides in the Thiazole Orange web absence or presence of carbon NPs. The four peptides are labeled from C1 to C4, respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gInfluence of Nanoparticle on Amyloid FormationFigure 3. Secondary structure profile for eight IAPP22?8 peptides in the absence or presence of carbon NPs. The eight peptides are labeled from C1 to C8, respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gFigure 4. Time series of b-sheet contents for IAPP22?8 peptides in the absence or presence of NPs. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gInfluence of Nanoparticle on Amyloid FormationFigure 5. The distribution of different b-sheet size for IAPP22?8 peptides with or without C60. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gthrough parallel or antiparallel hydrogen bonding bridges, which further stack tightly through steric effects at a completely dry interface, called a zipper [54]. Hence, the hydrogen bonds are considered to play an important role in the b-sheet formation, and this is also confirmed in our present work.Effective Adsorption as the First Step of the Interaction of IAPP22?8 and Carbon NanomaterialsIn all six trajectories for the carbon NP and IAPP22?8 systems, the peptides were adsorbed to the surfaces firstly, especially the surfaces of graphene and SWCNT. As Table S1 and Figure 1 shows, IAPP22?8 peptides and NPs were well separated initially, however, after 200 ns simulations, they were lying flat on the graphene surface or surrounding the SWCNT due to their strong interactions with the surfaces. In order to investigate the adsorptive behaviors of the studied peptide, we counted the contact number between atoms of peptides and the different NPs over the 200 ns simulation time ?with a criterion of 3.5 A (Figure 7). As can be seen, the peptidesFigure 6. The number of backbone hydrogen bonds and structural evolution: a) four peptides without NPs; b) eight peptides without NPs. Peptides are shown as cartoon: b-sheet in yellow, and others in white. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gexperienced initial fast structural relaxation, and were adsorbed on the surface quickly at the first 5 ns, and then the contact number of atoms was relatively up to a stable state, suggesting the interaction is steady after a rapid adsorption. For systems with four peptides, the contact number for graphene is around 400, and that with SWCNT and C60 are around 200 and 100, respectively. As for eight peptides, the contact numbers are around 800, 300 and 100 for graphene, SWCNT and C60, respectively. It is obviously that the adsorption capacity of graphene is the strongest, and that of C60 is the weakest. Accordingly, graphene shows higher 23977191 binding affinity with peptides than the other two carbon NPs. To further understand the adsorption mechanism and the preference of amino acid, we plotted the probability distribution of the minimum distance between the side chain of each residue and NP surface for the last 50 ns simulation in Figure 8. From Figure 8, it can be.L.pone.0065579.ginteraction plays an important role in the formation of hIAPP22?8 b-sheet-rich oligomers. In summary, without the effects of carbon NPs, hIAPP22?8 peptides are inclined to form partially ordered b-sheet-richoligomers with high b-sheet contents for both four and eight peptides. At the same time, the aggregation process was very quick. It’s well known that amyloid fibrils are generally formed by peptides in extended conformations (b-strands) into b-sheetsFigure 2. Secondary structure profile for four IAPP22?8 peptides in the absence or presence of carbon NPs. The four peptides are labeled from C1 to C4, respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gInfluence of Nanoparticle on Amyloid FormationFigure 3. Secondary structure profile for eight IAPP22?8 peptides in the absence or presence of carbon NPs. The eight peptides are labeled from C1 to C8, respectively. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gFigure 4. Time series of b-sheet contents for IAPP22?8 peptides in the absence or presence of NPs. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gInfluence of Nanoparticle on Amyloid FormationFigure 5. The distribution of different b-sheet size for IAPP22?8 peptides with or without C60. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gthrough parallel or antiparallel hydrogen bonding bridges, which further stack tightly through steric effects at a completely dry interface, called a zipper [54]. Hence, the hydrogen bonds are considered to play an important role in the b-sheet formation, and this is also confirmed in our present work.Effective Adsorption as the First Step of the Interaction of IAPP22?8 and Carbon NanomaterialsIn all six trajectories for the carbon NP and IAPP22?8 systems, the peptides were adsorbed to the surfaces firstly, especially the surfaces of graphene and SWCNT. As Table S1 and Figure 1 shows, IAPP22?8 peptides and NPs were well separated initially, however, after 200 ns simulations, they were lying flat on the graphene surface or surrounding the SWCNT due to their strong interactions with the surfaces. In order to investigate the adsorptive behaviors of the studied peptide, we counted the contact number between atoms of peptides and the different NPs over the 200 ns simulation time ?with a criterion of 3.5 A (Figure 7). As can be seen, the peptidesFigure 6. The number of backbone hydrogen bonds and structural evolution: a) four peptides without NPs; b) eight peptides without NPs. Peptides are shown as cartoon: b-sheet in yellow, and others in white. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065579.gexperienced initial fast structural relaxation, and were adsorbed on the surface quickly at the first 5 ns, and then the contact number of atoms was relatively up to a stable state, suggesting the interaction is steady after a rapid adsorption. For systems with four peptides, the contact number for graphene is around 400, and that with SWCNT and C60 are around 200 and 100, respectively. As for eight peptides, the contact numbers are around 800, 300 and 100 for graphene, SWCNT and C60, respectively. It is obviously that the adsorption capacity of graphene is the strongest, and that of C60 is the weakest. Accordingly, graphene shows higher 23977191 binding affinity with peptides than the other two carbon NPs. To further understand the adsorption mechanism and the preference of amino acid, we plotted the probability distribution of the minimum distance between the side chain of each residue and NP surface for the last 50 ns simulation in Figure 8. From Figure 8, it can be.
