Box. Closer Claw rises up and pushes box lid down. Brown
Box. Closer Claw rises up and pushes box lid down. Brown Claw puts head down next to box; Closer Claw returns to initial position subsequent to box. Panel E: Habituation events. Claw from Familiarization enters from behind curtain on suitable of stage; grasps object. Panel F: Static Baseline Event. Toys have changed location from habituation. Panel G: Test events. For the duration of NewGoal events, Claw grasps new object in old location. For the duration of NewPath events, Claw grasps old toy in new location. doi:0.37journal.pone.00962.gAttention to FamiliarizationHabituation events. A repeatedmeasures ANOVA with focus to familiarization, attention towards the first 3 habituation events, and attention towards the last 3 habituation events as withinsubjects elements and condition as a betweensubjects element revealed a considerable impact of condition (F2,76 3.3, p05, gp2 .08). Subsequent betweencondition comparisons revealed that infants attended substantially longer following Closer than Opener familiarization events ((typical of both) Closer 8.3s (SEM .25); Opener four.53s (SEM .59); F,38 six.74, p05; gp2 .5), but that infants within the Closer situation didn’t subsequently attend substantially longer than those in the Opener condition to either the first 3 or the last 3 grasping habituation events (first3hab_Closer 7.72 s (.8), first3hab_Opener five.62 s (.7), F,38 2.33, p..3; gp2 .06; last3hab_Closer 3.45 s (.52), last3hab_Opener 3.6 s (.87), F,38 .02, p..87; gp2 .00). Rate of habituation didn’t differ by condition: infants inside the Closer situation habituated in an average of 9.6 events (SEM .72; 420 didn’t habituate in 4 trials), and infants in the Opener condition habituated in anPLOS A single plosone.orgAgency Attribution Bias in Infancyaverage of 9.9 events (SEM .70; 520 did not habituate in 4 trials; univariate t38 .27, p..78, g2 .002).Attention to New Goal versus New Path test events: Preliminary analyses. There had been no all round conditiondifferences in attention in the course of test; that may be, the objectdirected actions of a claw that previously brought on a adverse outcome were not around the whole much more interesting to infants than had been the objectdirected actions of a claw that had previously brought on a constructive outcome (AverageTestAttentionCloser four.46 s (.39), AverageTestAttentionOpener four.0 s (.30), F,38 .28, p..60, gp2 .007). A preliminary repeatedmeasures ANOVA on infants’ hunting instances to New Goal versus New Path test events with sex, regardless of whether or not the infant had habituated in 4 trials, claw colour, claw side through familiarization, targeted toy (ball or bear), targeted toy side during habituation, and order of New GoalNew Path events in the course of test as betweensubjects factors, and with age, focus through familiarization, focus for the duration 
of the first 3 habituation trials, and attention for the duration of the final 3 habituation trials as covariates, revealed only a marginal impact on the side in the claw’s grasps throughout habituation (F,4 five.95, p .07, gp2 .60); there had been no other marginal or significant effects (though this ANOVA had a sizable quantity of variables, grouping variables and performing numerous smaller sized repeatedmeasures ANOVAs yielded no further effects). A followup repeatedmeasures ANOVA with targetedtoyside as the single betweensubjects variable revealed a order C.I. Natural Yellow 1 important impact (F,36 6.85; p05; gp2 .five): across PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21425987 each circumstances infants who viewed the claw grasp the toy around the far pedestal through habituation had been far more most likely to distinguish New Goal from New Path events.
