Admit different behaviors that act as symbolic borders. These borders have to not be blurred, thereby avoiding the introduction of a (reprehensible) element of your street (illness, condom) within the home space.Prevention strategies: “risk groups, lady of the house, and condom”We have noticed that minimizing the severity of AIDS did not prevent its meaning as a threat. Having said that, this threat is bounded by the notion of “risk group” and by the category of “street” (as opposed to “home”). So, it is actually within the middle of PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21261711 this selection of which means that the protection methods, stated by the respondents, achieve sense and orientation leading towards the adoption of exclusive (but unprotected) sex together with the “woman of the house”, or perhaps the use of condoms with “women from the street”. Individuals identified by respondents as belonging to “risk groups” nonetheless refer to the classic groups identified by epidemiologists throughout the initial phase in the epidemic, within the late 1980s: homosexuals, drug customers, and sex specialists. Respondents exclude “women with the house” and themselves from these groups, indicating low self-perception of risk. She (wife) has the self-confidence that I’m around the road, but alone. And I also have self-assurance that she also respects me and is alone. (…) We are not (…) part of the threat group (…) they may be folks who use drugs (…) with several partners. (r. ten, 51 years old) Therefore, avoiding sexual relations with various folks particularly, “prostitutes, ladies 
from the street, and fags” restricting them (virtually) exclusively to the “woman from the house”, was deemed by respondents as a fantastic preventive technique, even if it truly is of tough execution. I believe it prevents [AIDS], whenever you never go out with any woman however the lady in the house. (…) By means of the woman 1 gets it as well, but in the fag is a lot more guaranteed. (r. 7, 49 years old) Respondents categorize subjects and situations, present in their contexts of social interaction, to measure different degrees of threat. The category “woman of your house” is not restricted only to the wife, also involving females that have certain attributes on the space in the “house”. This really is, consequently, a “language of relations” (greater than substantive attribute!) as Goffman advocates about stigma a language made within a broader net of meanings. Among the respondents, one example is, will not use condoms in the extramarital partnership having a “girlfriend”. The truth that the “girlfriend” is married to a further man (taking the place of “woman on the house”), in addition for the long term “dating”, justifies for him the unprotected sex. When I am dating from time to time it passes, with out a condom. But not any person (…) There’s a lady … but I know her for nine years (…) Often, I do not use condom, no. But if I get a lady I never know, I have to make use of. (…) She’s a married woman. (…) I always pass by there, I see her all of the time. (r. 12, 54 years old) We see that the use of condoms, though not constant, is additional associated to the space on the “street”, as a way to meet the so-called “men’s needs” for sex, possibly extra present in Methionine enkephalin chemical information extended routes. A lot of of your girls who populate the contexts of social interaction of truck drivers, specifically these involved with sexual service, are considered to become “anyone”; thatDOI:ten.1590S1518-8787.Vulnerability of truck drivers to HIVAIDSMagno L Castellanos MEPis, as somebody with out bonds and who has no big concerns using the threat of infection by diseases “rotten women” within the words of a inte.
